Post are getting deleted

There are plenty of ebony shots that do well on this site. Unfortunately, most guys who capture ebony pics are doing so with potatoes instead of cameras. This is another case of complete arrogance…all these guys taking blurry shots, shots where subjects are far away, shots out of dirty car windows, using old outdated cameras, etc. They have the arrogance to tell us all that their photos are “high quality” and “amazing” but in reality are blurry blobs.

Instead of working to improve their skills they go right to attacking the forum as “racist.”

3 Likes

Just a tip, if You have any post that received a good amount of likes and comments try posting again in that same period of time of the day lol, keep track if it’s weekends or weekdays maybe, that definitly has something to do, especially when You see a post doing great during the first hours, comments and likes, then after some time has passed it stops being visited, time zones matters Here…

1 Like

Y’all are giving advice as if it’s the time of day OP posts is his problem. It is not! It’s the poor quality of his posts that are keeping him from being successful. There’s no hack that can replace improving on one’s techniques.

4 Likes

You’re shots are always good, but I bet you didn’t start off that way…am I right? It took some time to work out and practice.

I spent a decade learning photography before I could make a living at it…I took thousands of shitty pictures, but I learned from each blunder and worked to improve each shot I took.

I’m still not satisfied with all of them…it takes some practice to get it right…there’s just no substitute for it.

4 Likes

I’m sure you’re right dbcooper. You’re the one that has seen the photos and have an eye for these things.

It isn’t my intention to overly reassure the OP, but some neutral (and good) advice can help take the sting out of your bluntness. Someone new might feel like they’re not cut out for this if all they get is telling it like it is.

What you said had to be said. I don’t dispute it. Thank you for having quality standards.

2 Likes

I’m trying an experiment. These are some older pics of mine. I always wanted to share them, but didn’t think they were good enough quality. She’s cute, but the shots and quality aren’t amazing, early pics from a crappy phone. That said, they’re better than some I see make it through.

I thought, in light of this discussion, I’d post her. It’s not looking good for my post right now :slightly_smiling_face:

You flooded the forum with repeatedly rejected posts. The post all needed rotated, a couple were either 100’ away or blurry. You have been warned, and suspended.

No one is deleting those posts that were approved BtW, there are several rejected but at least 10 are kicked by the system…not getting the likes. A few deserved them, I agree. It s when you’re posting, that’s all. I have a few that didn’t make it myself. Mods are not deleting g posts except when breaking rules or are really blurry/shit, and not rotated. It’s not hard to rotate.

3 Likes

My expectations are simple…don’t be blurry, be nicely cropped and rotated, have a decent resolution. I don’t expect everyone to have professional level photos, I just expect them to not suck.

5 Likes

BTW The forum wanted to see the pics rotated and cropped, it seemed a huge amount of people voted at the time. Mods listened.

2 Likes

If anybody still cares, my mid post got automatically removed. It was kind of interesting, I got messages asking for more pics from the set. I thought the set was worth sharing, but had a 50-50 chance of making it. It wasn’t blurry, fat/ugly girl or uncropped, but it was not typical shots of a brunette girl’s ass (billed as BLONDE GODDESS!!!) in dark leggings either.

I’ve noticed we basically have three cases for decent posts:

  1. lots of people kinda like a post & it hits the Like threshold or
  2. a few people really like a post, but it can’t hit the threshold & they are disappointed it goes away
  3. lots of people really like the post and it’s amazing

The current system works for case 1 & 3, but less so for case 2. I don’t have a better solution, I see why it’s done this way. I’m just making an observation.

Anyway, experiment over! :slightly_smiling_face:

3 Likes

Yeah, it gets on my nerves. I’d rather have a blurry pic than a disgusting pic of the C.E.O of obesity, in high-definition.

Fat=rolls without definition; Thick=maintains definition and curves.

Bro TBH everyone that joins this site is a victim to this…yes it is bias very on how u upload them… Id like to think because they have good phone…you should too and I think it’s stupid and not fair for people that simply can’t help they have a crappy phone.

@Anon0man Like all professions one must utilize purposeful instruments for the purposed end. The latter means you will have to make investments. I Just got the S23. Don’t complain, do and act.

Devise other methods if your current approach does not work.

1 Like

Even the cheapest, most basic smart phones have decent cameras. There’s no excuse for the blurry garbage that some people post. It’s like they are shooting with an iPhone 1 that has grease smeared all over the lens…

3 Likes

Note to self: @dbcooper says… use… nothing, newer than… iPhone 1…but first… smear grease… on lens.

Got it! Off to eBay to see what I can find. Success is now guaranteed!

(kidding!)

3 Likes

I mean come on! If the insurgents in Afghanistan can broadcast every beheading in perfect 4k video, there’s no excuse for a blurry blobsquatch pic.

2 Likes

:rofl:

Wait… wait… did I get those instructions backwards?

(stealing "blobsquatch"for future use)

1 Like

I love the term “blobsquatch.” It comes from the sasquatch hunting community. It’s their term for a blurry picture some guy claims is a real life sasquatch photo…in reality it’s just a blurry blob…like so many of the photos on this site, lol.

1 Like

Alright y’all I’m back at it again. Will be experimenting again with this problem. I’ve got better “candies” now.
Thanks for all the advice. Hope this site continues to improve.