When/if he returns, he’s gonna act like he’s the real victim here, isn’t he?
3 Likes
100%
He’ll also say that his posts were taken down “for no good reason.”
3 Likes
Good job on the fallow up db. 
2 Likes
What about these type of telegram finds?
I’d never claim anyone’s as my own. I don’t have the greatest work but I’m content. And if I want better I go on telegram. Only problem is majority of the time there’s nobody to give credit to. Whoever posts them either crops out watermarks or just doesn’t include them.
48 Likes
We allow the sharing of other people’s work, so long as you don’t claim credit for them. Make sure to label the posts as “non OC” or “Not Original Content.” The shots you posted there look like they are legit candids. The shots the other guy posted are not candids because the subject knows she is being filmed, or is even filming herself. It’s basically staged/ posed. The point of this forum is to share pics of women who don’t know they are being filmed.
Does that make sense?
4 Likes
We have a new entry 
Hall of Shame
This poster has been on my radar for awhile.
I have enough damning evidence to present.
Recently Highfun posted jasoncashh02 content.
The OC watermarks were removed but I had
the original video and knew he was posting Not OC.
His post 
Original with jasoncashh02 watermarks
Next fraud post
After finding the real video source.
Posted in 2021. Original shooter: classi
Evidence found on tumblr and candidshine.
Next fraud post
Highfun cropped out 
watermarks
in all pics and video.
Original Shooter: BreakNeckCandids
I have the original video from BreakNeckCandids,
Full pics with original watermarks
Next fraud post
Found on tumblr. Original shooter unknown?
This set was posted and reposted dozens of times.
Likely found it on tumblr. Same exact pics and vid.
Next fraud post
Found video at sexycandidgirls
This video version above has not been cropped. 
Highfun cropped out the sexycandidgirls watermarks
in his posted version of the video.
Their are more fraudulent posts by highfun, but why bother.
He knows the truth and now we all know the truth.
Highfun was clearly passing off other shooter’s
content as his own content.
15 Likes
This is why I stopped posting on here tbh but thank ya’ll for being diligent doing this.
7 Likes
Literally like what’s the point I honestly don’t get it
2 Likes
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. This guy is a troll and keeps coming back with different usernames to post the same stuff over and over again.
3 Likes
https://forum.candidgirls.io/t/first-candid-thoughts-milf-in-lulu-spandex/22017
Dont know who shot it but Ive seen this posted before
Looks like it was removed. Always take a screen shot
of the post people so we can archive here.
That way when the mods remove it, and they will. We will have
a record of the person and the post. And save the photos as well.
Screen shot the top of the post. Include the title. Include the user.
Include the first photo of the post or if possible all the photos.
Thanks
1 Like
I’m pretty sure I already know the answer, but would you also need to include (non OC) if the watermark is shown/clear to see?
1 Like
When posting any work not shot by yourself. Not original content.
ALWAYS in the title state (Not OC) or (Non OC).
That will prevent you from being featured here.
Thanks
2 Likes
Out of respect for the OC shooter, it’s best not to post watermarked content.
2 Likes
Understood. Just had to ask just in case someone thought they would use the “well, the watermark is shown” excuse
1 Like
Completely understand.
1 Like
He claims to be new user with .gifs & pics thatve been posted before
1 Like
I thought i add someone too.
I present you: @Johnyass
Found the same woman + multiple shots of her on a paid website.
4 Likes
@Voidayge reached out to me expressing remorse. I think that deserves some credit. He handled it well, so in my books that earns redemption.
3 Likes